Forum
Performance and configs comparison
Created 7th November 2009 @ 14:22
Add A Reply Pages: 1 2 3 Next »
Ok, so here’s the idea: different people with different comps benchmark a timedemo I provide and post with results and configs if they want to share. I’d prefer people to do one with m0re highhigh and all maxed out from the menu, just to get an idea of the performance with that kind of settings, but if your computer dies when you crank the settings up just one of those would have to do. Also any custom config benchmarks are welcome.
Ignore the amount of failure in the timedemo, I just woke up and played a bit of dm and recorded it for a minute or two. 5on5 badlands dm should provide with a nearly genuine performance as in 6on6’s.
So in a nutshell:
1. Download the timedemo
2. Timedemo with your own config if you have one, all maxed out from the menu (mention multicore on/off) and with m0re’s highhigh if you can be bothered. Also use dx95 for the max-out test and dx81 for the m0re’s highhigh. Also mention your resolution, I forgot to say it earlier. :p
3. Post the results here (each config and it’s fps, your hardware configuration and any possible windows-side tweaks you use that affect the performance)
Here’s the timedemo: http://more.pp.fi/rake/rake-timedemo.dem
I’ll post my results later, kinda busy fixing my comp atm. :p
READ: A swedish friend of mine asked how to do the benchmark and it’s simple: just type “timedemo rake-timedemo” in console without the quotation marks.
Last edited by Rake,
HW: Windows XP, ATi HD 4870 512, E8400 @ 3ghz, MSI p45-neo3, 4 gigs of 5-5-5-18 800mhz ddr2 ram.
All maxed 1024×768: 8686 frames 76.343 seconds 113.78 fps ( 8.79 ms/f) 9.938 fps variability
m0re’s highhigh 1024×768: 8686 frames 42.614 seconds 203.83 fps ( 4.91 ms/f) 33.084 fps variability
Gamebooster improved my fps with all maxed out from 113,78 to around 135. No difference for highfps tho.
Last edited by Rake,
What do you expect from the results? Average, min/max fps?
Well, the timedemo outputs the avg fps and avg variability from the avg fps, and that’s pretty much all I want. :p
lil bit faster dl http://more.pp.fi/rake/rake-timedemo.dem
intel core duo e6400 @ 2.4GHz
nvidia 9500GT 1024mb
2GB ddr2 800MHz
windows xp sp3
m0rehighfps @ 1280×800: 8686 frames 57.975 seconds 149.82 fps ( 6.67 ms/f) 24.597 fps variability
also notice i’ve renamed my configs to fps and highfps, not highigh anymore 8)
Last edited by M0re,
Windows XP, E6600GT, 9600GT 512MB, 2GB RAM, GA-P35-DS3R, 1280×1024 resolution
Old m0re highfps config, with dx9:
8686 frames 63.160 seconds 137.52 fps ( 7.27 ms/f) 19.389 fps variability
With everything on maxmaxmax and high bloom factor:
8686 frames 102.755 seconds 84.53 fps (11.83 ms/f) 14.210 fps variability
Last edited by Waster,
HW: Windows 7 x64, ATi HD 4870 512MB, E8400 3ghz, Asus P5QL Pro, 4GB Corsair 5-5-5-18 800mhz DDR2
1680×1050
All high settings, mat_picmip -10, mat_usehwm* 1, mat_queue_mode 2,hdr OFF etc:
8686 frames 71.218 seconds 121.96 fps ( 8.20 ms/f) 12.306 fps variability
m0re highfps:
8686 frames 56.144 seconds 154.71 fps ( 6.46 ms/f) 15.567 fps variability
TF2 was restarted inbetween. I’d run them both twice during a TF2 session, but TF2 is crashing very often at the moment.
Last edited by AlphaPulsar,
Alpha, I find your highfps result quite odd. :o We have pretty much the same rig and you get 25% less fps?
Alpha, I find your highfps result quite odd. :o We have pretty much the same rig and you get 25% less fps?
Different resolution.
Machine specs
Asus P5E3 Deluxe
Intel Q9450 @ 2,66ghz
nVidia GTX285
2x Corsair 1Gb @ 1066mhz DDR3
OS: Windozer XP
8686 frames 62.116 seconds 139.84 fps ( 7.15 ms/f) 18.809 fps variability
TF2 settings: 1680×1050, AA 4x and Anisotropic 4x, everything else maxed out, DX9.
Last edited by Pamppu,
Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz
4GB ddr2 800 mhz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 896MB
Windows 7
1680:1050
default configs (removed cfg folder, dxlevel 95): 8686 frames 90.039 seconds 96.47 fps (10.37 ms/f) 9.096 fps variability
morehighfps (dxlevel 81): 8686 frames 51.640 seconds 168.20 fps ( 5.95 ms/f) 39.051 fps variability
Last edited by tarmo-,
Alpha, I find your highfps result quite odd. :o We have pretty much the same rig and you get 25% less fps?
Different resolution.
Might be, I’ll test his resolution later today.
Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 3.15GHz (MSI P35 Neo-F)
2GB apacer ddr2 800 @ 900 mhz (5-5-5-15)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600Gt 512MB (no overclocking)
Windows 7
1024×768
default configs (removed cfg folder, dxlevel 95):
8686 frames 81.072 seconds 107.14 fps ( 9.33 ms/f) 8.760 fps variability
morehighfps (dxlevel 81):
8686 frames 46.016 seconds 188.76 fps ( 5.30 ms/f) 29.420 fps variability
mycfg (dxlevel 81+ modified old morehighfps (mat_filtertextures 1 + shadows)):
8686 frames 51.091 seconds 170.01 fps ( 5.88 ms/f) 27.624 fps variability
Last edited by Spicke,
Add A Reply Pages: 1 2 3 Next »
content rss