Forum

I think it’s funny that if the poll had gone in the favour of banning the fan then the reaction from people opposed to it would be that, the people have spoken and democracy rules.

yup, its pretty funny isn’t it

So it’s OK if you do it, but even the idea of us doing it is hilarious?

I think it’s funny that if the poll had gone in the favour of banning the fan then the reaction from people opposed to it would be that, the people have spoken and democracy rules.

yup, its pretty funny isn’t it

So it’s OK if you do it, but even the idea of us doing it is hilarious?

If “we” do what?

“You” are the one quoting the poll.

I never wanted a poll as I knew valve would nerf the fan eventually.

I won’t hold my breath.

The “nerf” only fixed bs stun at insane ranges.

Which was 99% of the whining about FaN pre-nerf.

Tbh the answers of the poll are indeed quite misleading, you can interpret limit 1 in both ways, as both parties pointed out.

The poll should’ve been “Ban FaN? yes/no” and IF no has the majority of the answers, there should be another one “limit to 1 per team? yes/no”.

No before voting you should read.
It clearly says
“Weapons
Limit 2 = No limit | Limit 1 = weapon can be used once | Limit 0 = weapon disabled”

Tbh the answers of the poll are indeed quite misleading, you can interpret limit 1 in both ways, as both parties pointed out.

The poll should’ve been “Ban FaN? yes/no” and IF no has the majority of the answers, there should be another one “limit to 1 per team? yes/no”.

No before voting you should read.
It clearly says
“Weapons
Limit 2 = No limit | Limit 1 = weapon can be used once | Limit 0 = weapon disabled”

-_______-

The point wasnt what limit 1 means but how you can interpret it.
The FaN supporters say: Yea, it means that x % want it to be partly enabled, whereas the FaN bashers say: It means x % want it to be partly disabled.

Tbh the answers of the poll are indeed quite misleading, you can interpret limit 1 in both ways, as both parties pointed out.

The poll should’ve been “Ban FaN? yes/no” and IF no has the majority of the answers, there should be another one “limit to 1 per team? yes/no”.

No before voting you should read.
It clearly says
“Weapons
Limit 2 = No limit | Limit 1 = weapon can be used once | Limit 0 = weapon disabled”

*woosh* (argument going over your head)

The general idea we’re trying to get across here is that limit 1 is in a way agreeing with the idea that the fan is a bit overpowered. Why would you honestly think that we thought limit 1 = ban? Seriously, think before you post.

^^

Was pretty clear to me.

Kluniq stop +1’ing everyone else and come up with a decent argument yourself.

The general idea we’re trying to get across here is that limit 1 is in a way agreeing with the idea that the fan is a bit overpowered.

limit 1 is also agreeing that it is way way way way way way way too underpowered to be banned outright and even considering it is an outrageous idea.

See what I did there?

The general idea we’re trying to get across here is that limit 1 is in a way agreeing with the idea that the fan is a bit overpowered.

limit 1 is also agreeing that it is way way way way way way way too underpowered to be banned outright and even considering it is an outrageous idea.

See what I did there?

No, because if it was that underpowered, then it wouldn’t need to be restricted.