Forum
sv_restrict_aspect_ratio_fov 2 please
Created 23rd May 2013 @ 19:03
Locked Pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
I dont see why it should be 0, as it favours people with better monitors (and while there will always be some pay to win element, surely you want to keep it to a minimum)
Next topic: Ban “r_drawviewmodel 0” plyz
I’m sick of these cheaters that use this unfair advantage against me, I have always played with viewmodels and these people have an unfair advantage against me, clearly they can see more pixels than me so it must be banned.
STOP LIKING WHAT I DON’T LIKE
sv_restrict_max_hz 60 while we are at it please
BREAKING NEWS:
RULE CHANGE – ASPECT RATIO 16:9/16:10 IS NOW BANNED, ALL PLAYERS ARE FORCED TO USE 4:3
BEST REGARDS ETF2L STAFF
NO FUN ALLOWED
CHEERS BYTE
Last edited by MARIANO,
I agree, force only 3:4 resolutions.
Ban r_drawviewmodel 0.
Ban caption modifications.
Ban high quality shadows.
Ban usage of drivers tools to bypass mat_picmip.
Ban modifications that remove gun impact effects (this cripples fps, so people who have it disabled have an advantage).
Most of these can be verified with screenshots.
I’d like to have my personal preference pleased, which is sv_cheats 1. Please, it’s personal preference
Quoted from Casual
I agree, force only 3:4 resolutions.
Ban r_drawviewmodel 0.
Ban caption modifications.
Ban high quality shadows.
Ban usage of drivers tools to bypass mat_picmip.
Ban modifications that remove gun impact effects (this cripples fps, so people who have it disabled have an advantage).
Most of these can be verified with screenshots.
Ban OpenPlugin
oh wait
you’re a fucking retard
Quoted from Admirable
This is actually something being considered by admins at present.
Can someone (skeej) please make a clear and concise case for keeping it at 0, so I don’t have to trawl through various threads? :D
Not sure if trolling?
I mean like, seriously? I had discussions with nearly every league and head admin on #etf2l #tf.europe and #etf2l.admins on various occasions and replied to nearly every admin that posted about this in previous topics. I even posted around a pastebin log where most stuff was discussed as well. I repeated every argument a million times and rebutted every possible argument for sv_restrict_aspect 2. Why should I repeat the argument now, when past experiences have taught me that people either won’t listen or will forget in 2 days again?
On the off chance that you’re actually serious, I will drop all side arguments for my own sake, and put forth the main argument that goes on in favor of aspect 2, which is that “people with certain monitors have advantages over other people”:
Everyone can run any resolution they want and therefore any horizontalfov they want so everyone is equal.
I previously typed that sentence in caps with every word on a new line with an empty line between every word, but I think this post already has a high enough angry-nerd ratio as it is.
If one says: [ whiny voice ] “well my monitor is too small or my pc is too slow for windowed mode” (newsflash, you can run custom resolutions fullscreen btw), then Animal has the answer for you:
Quoted from AnimaL
sv_restrict_max_hz 60 while we are at it please
If you think about it, we SHOULD ban 120hz monitors or framerates over 60, because there are no software based workarounds to achieving the same result as someone who owns a 120hz monitor. Sounds pretty ridiculous right? Yeah, thats what I mean.
Last edited by skeej,
This thread is even more retarded than the open plugin thread.
Thanks for clarifying that skeej. Sorry for any distress caused :D
Quoted from Admirable
Thanks for clarifying that skeej. Sorry for any distress caused :D
<3
Locked Pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »