Forum

Quoted from Edd

Tbh the only ac program i would agree with is one that just takes screenshots, this would prevent wallhack. It is also less processor hungry because it doesn’t scan your pc for cheats in the background. This would stop a lot of crashes and sluggish pc speeds, the reason it shouldn’t perform invasive searches is because it is so easy to rename a cheat to something like mumble.exe (look at the famous vent.exe cheat from source) and they rarely catch anyone who has a braincell.

For the issue of client side cheats like triggerbot and aimbot, watching POV demos should suffice, to people who know what they are looking for its quite easy to see someone using an aimbot / triggerbot.

How many times does it have to be said, don’t make technical arguments if you have no idea how the software actually works!

(Just because the program does “invasive searches” doesn’t automatically mean that it makes you crash more often)

Quoted from Edd

Tbh the only ac program i would agree with is one that just takes screenshots, this would prevent wallhack. It is also less processor hungry because it doesn’t scan your pc for cheats in the background. This would stop a lot of crashes and sluggish pc speeds, the reason it shouldn’t perform invasive searches is because it is so easy to rename a cheat to something like mumble.exe (look at the famous vent.exe cheat from source) and they rarely catch anyone who has a braincell.

For the issue of client side cheats like triggerbot and aimbot, watching POV demos should suffice, to people who know what they are looking for its quite easy to see someone using an aimbot / triggerbot.

do you honestly think a third party programm which takes control over your pc and its cpu priority to gain file-structure access plus ressources to open/close data streams to save a motherf%cking screenshot will cause no performance issues?

edit: And how the f%ck do you come to the solution that you could hide your cheats with all its memory actions and game operations it does just by renaming the executable? Lol

So what? Some tools couldn’t detect it until mid 2009. Some tools couldn’t detect any shit till 2001. It doesn’t mean that aren’t tools out there which are capable by now mate. As I wrote about tools might try to fake their identity due a new name but they can’t hide their operations.

I’m also aware of the screenshots in aeq. I just tried to point out that switching to something else will still eat up your gaming performance plus you won’t track cheats which actually detect screenshot requests and untoggle themselves before.

So aeq retrieves and logs these operations as well. Sure you’ll end up losing even more performance. even if it’s nowhere near doing your ingame shot. But it’s still a trade.

http://steambans.com/index.php just relaunched.

I suggest before banning a player, submit there also a demo and see their results.

It might just be me but i think a ban from all tf2 leagues is going a bit far. Because some people could be falsely accused. I know alot of people do complain even when they have been banned but there still are alot of incidences where the accusations are false.

Quoted from Edd

Tbh the only ac program i would agree with is one that just takes screenshots, this would prevent wallhack. It is also less processor hungry because it doesn’t scan your pc for cheats in the background. This would stop a lot of crashes and sluggish pc speeds, the reason it shouldn’t perform invasive searches is because it is so easy to rename a cheat to something like mumble.exe (look at the famous vent.exe cheat from source) and they rarely catch anyone who has a braincell.

For the issue of client side cheats like triggerbot and aimbot, watching POV demos should suffice, to people who know what they are looking for its quite easy to see someone using an aimbot / triggerbot.

This. It worked great in battlefield 2 and visual cheats are used even more in source games.

Double post sorry :S

steambans woudl be great

X-Ray won’t help against triggerbot/aimbot.