Forum

Quoted from LuckyLuke

[…]
I don’t, I record at 120. :p

Just render it to 30… is that a problem?

turn on frame blending then.

Quoted from decap

[…]

turn on frame blending then.

Well if I do so it looks like this: http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/3104/test2kf.jpg

Without, like this: http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3968/test1hh.jpg

(Both same frame)

exactly, it makes it 50x nicer to watch. it’s motion blur, it makes the motion in your video a fuckton more fluid. otherwise youre just watching a fucking slideshow, which is fucking disgusting.

you post screenshots of how it looks but really, no ones going to pause the video and go oh, what a nice screenshot. it’s MOTION BLUR, its for a VIDEO, its for MOVING OBJECTS.

FUCK.

bunch of movie maker noobs

Quoted from LuckyLuke

lol, gonna have to record at 300 fps then and see if that looks any better… because THIS blurry is really…. way too blurry imo. I’ll try a mixclip or w/e with that, thanks for the help anyways -.-

Ye, anything less than 240 looks fairly bad with frame blending at 30fps, imo 300 is the sweet spot between effort to record/edit and quality (I’m also fairly sure its what morf uses).

didnt watch it yet (yes im german)
but recording at 120 should be fine, just render it to 60 and not 30.
or if you want to render to 30, use after effects and use their frame blending (the best version) and not the shitty vegas shit. even though it takes longer to render, its really worth the effort!

Why render at 30 fps when you can render at 60 fps :D