Well thought out input by admins is not for public consumption, meet once a season and review major topics of debate, keep the debates and justifications for rules off away from the public.

I agree some response to a suggestion is merited, but not in the level it is being done right now. Either:

– Follow up with questions on suggestions that are relevant to the particular subject/rule (and not aggressively toned).
– Make sure it is clear in the disclaimer the date of the next admin review of the rules, treat it like a board meeting where policy is reviewed and discussed at length then either voted on or ruled on, like how actual companies and organizations operate, not this playground nonsense.


Last edited by Hildreth,