Highlander Season 4 powered by BlackOut Gaming
Division 5B
Week 5
Scheduled:
Results submitted:
by Underyx (Crusaders)
Crusaders
vs
Яoyal Branch
4 - 2
Players
| Яoyal Branch | (10) Zoromidar, Araś, supra, Gringo, icyyyyyyyyyyyy, Glamhoth, zinneR, Grunwald1987, Raczet, Alex |
| Crusaders | (9) PingWIN, Underyx, Kacsaa, Zyan, mici, keksz, peso, prince of denmark, Mamut |
| Unrostered | (3) falqonium, Stefan, Vabe |
Demos
- Map 1 (pl_barnblitz_pro): First Person [Pruned] by supra (211 Downloads)
19 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
content rss
The following players are accepted as mercs:
Raczet
zinneR
And that’s a merc from our side.
7:01 PM - [T-A!] Underyx x 6: http://etf2l.org/forum/user/626467:01 PM - [T-A!] Underyx x 6: how about this guy?
7:02 PM - *|Я|B|* supra: ok
Yeah, accepted.
GG & TY for match
Fill the screens and points please.
Dear Teams, you entered a 3-3 as result on Barnblitz. But this is not possible, since payload maps are played Best of 3. If you played only two rounds and both teams won one round, you have to play a third round. Please play this round as soon as possible. Valid results for payload maps are: 6-0, 0-6, 4-2 or 2-4.
If you submitted the results wrong or have other problems please contact an admin on IRC. Type “!admin” in channel #etf2l on quakenet.
My apologies!
The other team suggested the idea of doing a ‘golden cap’ after the round, but we reached a consensus rather quickly dismissing the idea of needing a tie breaker. I’ll ensure that the last round is played as soon as possible—thanks for the heads up!
Ok, nice :)
I’ll contact with you on Steam and we’ll arrange war again.
Match has been schleduled to 21.04.13, 19:00 CEST.
Please, check and accept that date here.
I can confirm that we indeed have agreed to play the tie breaker round 7pm CEST on April 21.
I also propose that (if we get Яoyal Branch’s approval) we consider this an official fixture, to which the same rules apply as to a date set through ETF2L’s team admin system, including rule 3.4 from the ETF2L general rules section (‘A delay of 15 minutes is allowed’)
Other than this, however, the last round should be carried out as if we played it on April 14, which implies for instance that team roster changes are invalid as of April 14, and that the three mercs who played in our first two rounds are allowed by default for the third round as well.
These are my proposed rules for our match, as ETF2L has no official word on how our match should go down.
Dear Teams, we have no specific rules for a case like that.
If both teams agree, the rules for this match Underyx posted can be applied. Please answer if you agree to this rule or not before the match or you can always contact an admin or IRC.
can we this merc ? : http://etf2l.org/forum/user/23791/
can we accept this merc ? : http://etf2l.org/forum/user/51659/
http://etf2l.org/forum/user/51659/
Our merc. Can you accept?
In addition to the two previous mercs, we’re also allowing a third one for April 21: Stefan Biegunka
Result approved. GG WP
GG&WP
gg