NA Rules Cup - LOW-ish

Final

Date Scheduled:
Results submitted:
by X-L (Azilum Gaming)

cp_snakewater

cp_snakewater

4 - 5

[Screenshots: A ]

Belgium Azilum Gaming vs European Team Colonslash
0 - 3

SteamID Screenshots: A B

Players

Azilum Gaming (6) X-L, Nadir, Korny, Explo, Zylaen, Pro.totype
Team Colonslash (4) Miek, Henghast, Will, Smirre
Unrostered (2) Fallen, Bulle

Warnings


20 Comments

  1. Will said:

    2 mercs being used by default:
    http://etf2l.org/forum/user/46725/
    http://etf2l.org/forum/user/45597/

    IPPW:
    connect s1.colonslash.eu:28001;password tc1war

    glhf

  2. Maniac said:

    Default Round to TC due to a violation of the pause rule by Azilum. This changes the score to 5-4 to TC.

    Default round was given as you ignored the pause request and then proceded to capture second and middle, then proceeding to win the round. If you had followed the pause rule, TC would have had uber pushing into you’re kritz on last, and would have most likely won the fight.

  3. Korny: 4goD said:

    are you fucking serious ?

  4. Alchemy: FaZe said:

    They did exactly the same thing just before.

    Just sayin’

  5. Maniac said:

    No Alchemy the situation was different as they paused quickly and no objectives happened inbetween you asking for the pause and them agreeing.

    Not only did objectives change in this situation but you also blatantly ignored their request to pause with comments such as “who cares”.

    And yes Korny I am “fucking serious”

  6. Will said:

    Middle and 2nd were both being contested at the time you asked for the pause. We waited for one of those to be capped so we didnt have to pause in the middle of a firefight.

    Anyway lets not have a bitch fest here, leave this for the admins to decide what to do.

  7. X-L: AziluM said:

    I’d like to request the STV to check the truth of tc.reditio complaint.
    As mentioned before by alchemy, they did exactly the same 5 minutes before.

    I asked twice for a pause and I’m pretty sure that the 15 seconds delay to pause was exceeded.
    So we request 1 default round too.

  8. Will said:

    You can find the STV here (not 100% which one):
    http://stv.colonslash.eu/tcmatch1/

    And as the rules state: “The other team is then required to pause at the first appropriate time (e.g. not in the middle of a push).” We paused as soon as the push was over, you asked for pause and then continued to push/attack us. The difference in yours was when we asked you were capping second, you then decided to ignore us (spamming binds about not caring) and continued to cap middle while we stood around waiting for the pause.

    Hopefully you will see all this when you watch the STV and can then accept the admins decision.

  9. Pro.totype: AziluM said:

    corrompu

  10. Buffalo Bill: TDR » - T⑨ said:

    Please do explain how we are corrupt, Prototype.

  11. Alchemy: FaZe said:

    You’re not.

    But TC are just a bunch of mad retards because they’re to bad at TF2. I liked the fact that they played Vanilla in this Unlock Cup.

  12. nadirlebeau: said:

    Personally I do not care who won. Both teams played well and for my part I had a good evening. Pity indeed that TC win a decision but it is the admin game ;)
    Good luck for the future.

  13. Pro.totype: AziluM said:

    VIctory for TC !!!!
    but 2 mercs and more than fuzzy decision

  14. Oxy: TC.Express said:

    “I’d like to request the STV to check the truth of tc.reditio complaint.”

    Surely you were recording your POV demo? No?

    “But TC are just a bunch of mad retards because they’re to bad at TF2.”

    Well you just lost to them so that makes you even worse I guess.

  15. Pro.totype: AziluM said:

    we have not lost, looks better screens :)

  16. Alchemy: FaZe said:

    Thanks Oxy to confirm my sentence.

  17. Henghast: open - bobs said:

    “Personally I do not care who won. Both teams played well and for my part I had a good evening. Pity indeed that TC win a decision but it is the admin game ;)
    Good luck for the future.”

    I’m with you on this matter. It was a close well contested game. The game could’ve swung either way outside of the issues discussed. It’s unfortunate the final was decided in such a manner, I can assure you it was’nt our intent to claim victory with the complaint. Whether you believe that or not is irrelevant. We were upset that believing we had followed the letter of the law and what we believe to be the heart of the rule and to be mocked and treated in such a disrepectful manner rankled. We actually believed that Fallen’s drop was in the second half which would’ve forced a drawn game if we were granted a penalty round but it was the statement that we were unhappy that was paramount. I wish Azilium well for the upcomming season and in their future games.

    Responding to other comments, Oxy is not part of the team that played and not representative of that team but of the community.

    We did use unlocks, we ran with Escape plan on soldiers, Boston Basher on Scout (the other being mentally deficient scrapped his loaned weapon), various med locks and a few others where we felt it was beneficial. Having access to a vast array of weapons does not mean that you must use them to your detriment. I could point you to the fact that some US soldiers having played the EU rule set have stated intent to use shotguns next season instead of the current roamer load out.

    As to claims of corruption I would take that rather seriously and perhaps this is not the place to vent remarks made out of passion.

    All in all, thank you for the game, it was fun. The ugliness was avoidable and dissapointing for a number of reasons but it’s history. At most a lesson to be learnt from and I wish all involved people the best of luck for the future.

    Thank you,

  18. Fallen: TC said:

    Reditio got carried by medic merc.

  19. Pro.totype: AziluM said:

    corrupt is not appropriate, I grant you but this descision is not fair

  20. Spike Himself: TC said:

    That’s my boys!

    Well played to both :)

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.