Season 12 powered by Tt eSPORTS

Premier Division

Week 7

Date Scheduled:
Results submitted:
by ETF2L Staff

Default Win

France Punchline vs International smooth criminals
6 - 0

SteamID Screenshots: A B


smooth criminals (4) skeej, Brego, Luzzu, smziii
Punchline (6) Plapla, Captainhax, Flinn, Tek, Flippy, kustom3
Unrostered (5) quad, doudd, MightyMe, wOlliee, atmo



  1. Default Date said:

    Because this match has not been scheduled by either of the teams, a default date has been set for this match.
    The default date is: Sunday, 10 June 2012, 21:15
    Please play this match on the appointed time and submit the results.

  2. smziii: (Legendary Ratehacks) - Ascent said:

    gg wp full retard

  3. skeej: (ETF2L Donator) - UbeR | - Fe | said:


  4. Mark: Phase said:

    3 mercs?! SKEEJ MY BOY.

  5. Captainhax: AwS - DA! said:

    We didn’t ask for anything… admins did it by themself i guess

  6. payard: mLm said:

    It’s definitly not us who asked for the default win. As we told you yesterday, we had no problem playing against you with mercs. So please samr, don’t be a “full retard” and ask to the right people before acting like an ass with us

  7. smziii: (Legendary Ratehacks) - Ascent said:

    iam sorry i let admins remove my comment, it said match report by captain hax sorry sorry sorry kuddo kudo <3

  8. skeej: (ETF2L Donator) - UbeR | - Fe | said:

    GG, admins showing their best side.

    Yes, what we did was not allowed according to the rules. The same rules that can be bent everytime the admins feel like it. Don’t hide behind the “rules are rules” argument because we all know it’s bullshit.

    We committed a victimless crime. The admins chose to make some victims, for bureaucracy’s sake. Or maybe for their own amusement, I don’t know.

    We had to play this match even though Luzzu couldn’t show up. We chose to use a solly merc alongside another solly merc, because there were no other opportunities to play this game. If ANYONE that can probably be affected by this match results has a problem with wOllie or MightyMe being used instead of Luzzu, let us know. Otherwise the only reason admins are taking this decision is for themselves.

  9. kaidus: 7 - WiK? said:

    Sick work admins, keep those bastards in check.

  10. Mark: Phase said:

    I never liked Skeej.

  11. Clark: SDCK! said:

    What was the real score anyway?

  12. Retsh0ck: 32erz - 2strong said:

    fucking admins man

  13. Rockas: IDM. said:

    it was 3-3 clark

  14. skeej: (ETF2L Donator) - UbeR | - Fe | said:

    [16:22] if both teams agree, you can replay the game tonight
    [16:25] hmm
    [16:25] thats a bit last minute, but considering the league schedule, i can understand
    [16:25] i would have to see if i can get both teams
    [19:24] Crasp
    [19:24] we’re replaying the match @ 20cet
    [19:27] okie doke
    [19:27] remember screenshots etc

    Replayed the match, added new status + obscure + gully screenshot through “add screenshots”. Both teams had 1 merc which were allowed by both.

    Screenshots are not visible on top atm, so I will post the links:


  15. skeej: (ETF2L Donator) - UbeR | - Fe | said:

    The conversation above is between Crasp and me obviously, ETF2L doesn’t like the usage of “<" signs, so nicknames disappear.

    End score was 3-3 btw, forgot to mention that.


  16. Captainhax: AwS - DA! said:


  17. huhystah said:


  18. smziii: (Legendary Ratehacks) - Ascent said:

    really unfortunate that both of us couldnt pull of our A-Games

    nevertheless gg

  19. Crasp: (Legend) - BACΩN | - бекон said:

    Hi Punchline and atleast we tried not to drop!

    Both teams receive a major warning for manufacturing a preferable result rather than playing the match.

    The initial default win to Punchline for Decerto using 3 mercs will remain.


  20. smziii: (Legendary Ratehacks) - Ascent said:

    the good old times around 13th century where you didnt need any proove to punish someone just by making things up

    I am taking my hat of to this awesome jurisdiction

  21. Setlet: TCM said:

    That’s like the worst fraud attempt I’ve ever seen. Why couldn’t you just like have tight 4-3 matches or something like that if you wanted to fraud?

    Unless the match was a protest against the 2 merc rule.

  22. Luzzu said:

    That wasnt a fraud, we really played it with the ambition to reinvent the metagame.

    I don’t get this decision O_O

    Still, I save a last by tauntkilling as pyro.

  23. skeej: (ETF2L Donator) - UbeR | - Fe | said:

    What is the rule, or way of thinking here? Because again, things are being dealth with by making rules up on the spot. I has to be something alongside “teams are not allowed to let eachother win?” Thats the closest I can think of. But that rule doesn’t exist, and also can’t exist, because not only can team default matches to eachother at will, they can also default single maps (epsilon – tcm).

    Applying the term fraud here is really misleading and slandering. We, as teams, just let eachother win, no pretenses about that. We’re not trying to fraud anything. Teams do this all the time and it’s no problem. Now it’s suddenly a problem?

    So now admins can tell teams how to play their games? “You have to at least try to win with X effort”? Or only for this occasion?

    The major warning is even more nonsensical than the default loss. This whole thing proves that making or bending rules at admin’s discretion is everyday business for ETF2L. Couldn’t you simply have applied that admin’s discretion in the first place? We played a great game in our “real” match, to which nobody but admins had an objection. Should’ve left it like that.

  24. sheepy dog's hand: (puffy vulva) - bad said:

    At least take some notes on match throwing next time please.

  25. smziii: (Legendary Ratehacks) - Ascent said:

    doesnt matter had sex

  26. Setlet: TCM said:

    Since when people have thought match fixing is fine and that no one should be punished for it?

  27. Swifty: ξ(゜ヮ゜)ξ said:

    Admins really dropped the ball on this one…

  28. Jakle said:

    ahaha, this is awesome

    but wait, losing on purpose is against the rules? wat

  29. Tehgnarr: is good! said:

    This is comedy gold right here. I really like how skeej’s main argument seems to be: “Everybody and their moms are breaking the rules, why can’t we?” and how he honestly can’t see why fixing a match is bad. And samr shouting passive-aggressive semi-insults from safe distance…damn, I love the theatre.

  30. atmo said:

    0 pts

    my fault sry ttteam

  31. atmo said:

    at least i got into prem before that jakle shitter

  32. Vlijm: UbeR | said:

    Any STV?

  33. Sideshow: (ETF2L Donator) - ft. - WiK? said:

    another god-awful admin decision well played

  34. Daleth: ti. - [PG] said:

    So if I make a team in Div5, will I be banned for losing on purpose?

  35. Douchebag Drake: [LAG] - [MC] said:

    I should of been called to talk to etf2l admins about this match would of been one of my proudest moments ! Damn it!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.