x
ETF2L is looking for new Staff to recruit! Are you interested in supporting the league? Then click here for more details on what we can offer and how to apply! 

Season 9

Division 3b

Week 4

Date Scheduled:
Results submitted:
by ETF2L Staff

Default Win

Spain Ace of Spades vs Russia Warmfront lovers
6 - 0

Active Wildcards:

SteamID Screenshots: A B

Players

Warmfront lovers (5) kuzmichspb, Dint, viper, Teddy, Ferrum
Ace of Spades (6) mutaNT, Pan-z, Kemo, Krimz, Sikopata, Foxt
Unrostered (1) spirit

Warnings


20 Comments

  1. Default Date said:

    Because this match has not been scheduled by either of the teams, a default date has been set for this match.
    The default date is: Sunday, 24 April 2011, 20:30
    Please play this match on the appointed time and submit the results.

  2. Wildcard said:

    A wildcard has been taken for this match by Ace of Spades.
    You must reschedule and play this game before 07/05/2011.

  3. Default Date said:

    Because this match has not been scheduled by either of the teams, a default date has been set for this match.
    The default date is: Saturday, 07 May 2011, 20:30
    Please play this match on the appointed time and submit the results.

  4. Sikopata: [D3C] said:

    Hi there,

    I tried to contact Ferrum last days but seems to be off when I try to. As we already used a wildcard for this game and cant set a suitable date for both, we are able to play on default date if we cant contact you before. See you on our server connect 188.165.218.145:20198; password spades

    Please contact me or Krimz as soon as possible, to wonder if we’re playing on def date or anything else. If don’t we’ll be waiting on our server at def date.

  5. MEGAMIDDIE said:

    Again vitae.. thought you woulda learned the first time about player rules… hilarious stuff right there tbh.

  6. Ferrum: wdc... said:

    what the fuck merc was accepted

  7. huhystah said:

    Teddy wasnt ;) He’s still even not verified and you HAD to ask about him as well :)

  8. Ferrum: wdc... said:

    he was in our team before and we ragequit and after day we decide to continue ok,so what should i do?reshedule game,which should be played in April.No guys seriously it is srupid,give back us this two points,which we reached in honest game

  9. Ferrum: wdc... said:

    *he rageqit,not we

  10. Ferrum: wdc... said:

    no guys it’s stupid your main goal is to attarct team and giving default loss isn’t attractive

  11. Ferrum: wdc... said:

    and yeah it’s better to reshedule game to the next week,excellent yes,

  12. Ferrum: wdc... said:

    and i added him 8 hours before game,not before 5 mins

  13. irfx: EPA said:

    Another example of people who play for points, not for fairplay.

  14. Buffalo Bill: TDR » - T⑨ said:

    Lol @ Russians complaining. It doesn’t matter why he left the roster or that you decided to continue. He’s unverified, you have to ask the opponent to allow him. You don’t do that, you break the rules, you get the default loss. THAT is fairplay, letting vitae get away with rulebreaking is not.

  15. huhystah said:

    What Buffalo Bill said pretty much :)

  16. irfx: EPA said:

    You are right, but they have played this match, and took a default win afterwards. If one team does not approve a not verified player, it takes a default win immediately, without spending 1 hour for the game.

  17. Buffalo Bill: TDR » - T⑨ said:

    They played it without knowing vitae used an unverified player. It’s not that they knew he played and played regardless, they didn’t know he was playing until the status screen appeared and the SteamID checker showed him as unverified.

  18. irfx: EPA said:

    It would have sense, if this unverified player was from prem div, so he could depend on the score (not 100% guarantee though). But it was their player by default, who just re-joined the team. AoS just wanted their expected 6 points, so they decided to gain them using admins and their view of rules.

  19. Buffalo Bill: TDR » - T⑨ said:

    It doesn’t matter if it’s a Div6 player, a prem player, their own rejoining or even the shadow copy of the guy who leads the team. It’s an unverified player, thus he needs to be allowed by the opponent. That is not “AoS’s view of the rules” that IS the rules.

  20. Sikopata: [D3C] said:

    We were trying to arrange this game 3 or 4 times during a few weeks (including one of our wc) and the times we agreed on a date was suddenly or on the same day or 20 minutes earlier than the suitable hour for vitae (due to spain-russia timezone difference), we accepted to play earlier (we use to play 21.00-xx.xx) and even everytime willing to use a div2 or div1 merc (maybe a inactive div2-1 or whatever but idk and idc). Even with that kind of mercs we accepted one of them but once tried to play with 2, so the answer was no.

    Finally the time passed through until default date and in a last try to play this on time without minor warnings nor using a wc (another), we agreed on the date without confirmation by the other part until same match date’s afternoon, and I remember the def date was a SATURDAY, no need to say what this means.

    This time again asked for a merc div1 on etf2l, and regardless we we didn’t like and didn’t appear fair for us we agreed, to finally play.

    After uploading the results, I checked the match page and realised about the unverified player (I dont have time to check team history of each player mates, I did it later). I contacted Huhy without knowing what means a non-accepted unverified player for etf2l rules (minor warnings or def win, yeah that’s what I supposed), but I was tired of this match and all the annoying issues and it was the last straw.

    That being said, feel free to think we’re points hunters or unsportsmanship players, I can’t change the others thoughts.

    And yeah, inb4 tl;dr

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.