Season 6 powered by SteelSeries Xai

Division 3b

Week 5

Scheduled: 8 Nov 2009, 20:15
Results submitted: 22 Nov 2009, 22:19
by tl.mac (Synergy)

This match does not count as one of the teams dropped from this competition.

Synergy vs Special Air Service
6 - 0

SteamID Screenshots: A

Players

Synergy	(4) PharadoX, klugas, Sprit, tl.mac
Special Air Service	(3) Manco, midas, Rokki
Unrostered	(5) terrrroR, r7anfan, rtan, gumi, wonder

Warnings

• Special Air Service [Major] Using an unlisted player

9 Comments

1. Default Date said:
   

   Mon 2 Nov 2009, 15:52

   Because this match has not been scheduled by either of the teams, a default date has been set for this match.
   The default date is: Sunday, 08 November 2009, 21:15 CET
   Please play this match on the appointed time and submit the results.

2. Manco: [SAS] - [SAS] said:
   

   Sat 7 Nov 2009, 22:07

   Gonna have to use a wildcard I’m afraid

3. Manco: [SAS] - [SAS] said:
   

   Thu 12 Nov 2009, 22:30

   How about Sun 22nd @ 21.00 CET?

4. tl.mac: Paprika! said:
   

   Sun 15 Nov 2009, 13:47

   I’m waiting for answer from Maggots.
   Probably we can play – for 100% I’ll confirm this as soon as possible.

5. tl.mac: Paprika! said:
   

   Thu 19 Nov 2009, 00:41

   Ok guys we play on sunday 22nd 21:00 CET.

6. Manco: [SAS] - [SAS] said:
   

   Sun 22 Nov 2009, 20:31

   http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197972629018

   Can you let me have the server ip & passy, also we may be a few minutes late as we have another etf2l match @ 20.00 CET

7. SnowiE: -9w- - -9m- said:
   

   Mon 23 Nov 2009, 21:05

   SAS used three mercs, please note this is against Rule 1.6.7.
   “You can ask your opponent to allow you a ringer (maximum: 2) to field in your team.”

8. tl.mac: Paprika! said:
   

   Mon 23 Nov 2009, 21:24

   Both teams agreed to play mercenaries.

   I don’t see the problem …

9. fJack: k^m said:
   

   Tue 1 Dec 2009, 18:46

   You either have to remove that Major warning or give one to ‘Be Nice’. We agreed to 3 mercs, as it appears is the case here. This is inconsistent.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.