x
ETF2L is looking for new Staff to recruit! Are you interested in supporting the league? Then click here for more details on what we can offer and how to apply! 

Forum

Fixed Weaponspread [Discussion]

Created 8th January 2010 @ 17:09

Add A Reply Pages: « Previous 1 ... 7 8 9 10 Next »

Ched

.tony

I find fighting against scouts much more bearable with this on. (As a soldier) I also enjoy knowing how much damage I am going to do if I shoot a well aimed shot. Even playing as a scout, duels against other scouts are much more bearable and feel more fair.

I reckon that if they gave the scout 1 more hp, there would be someone who complains. Common sense please people.

Ash

cc//
cc//

Personally I think this is a good move, it now means scout combat is based around aim more and not luck. At least now you know that have to aim well to kill things and not rely on the spread of the shot anymore.

I’m all for scout shots doing the damage they should when their aim is perfect, and hopefully this stops those shots that do 13 one time then 70 damage the next at mid range.

As much as I FUCKING HATE Scouts and think they’re powerful enough already, I agree with this.

Jakeman

glorious 1 shots

Nigh

¿
TF2.ro

its a non-random thing, so i agree with 1

Priem

I vote 1, and I’m a soldier, WHAT’S YOUR GAME?!

jacat

0 ^^)

FADe

shouldn’t even be debated in my eyes.

1

antyjc

2ne1

1.
It barely makes any difference either way, damage is more consistent. Hitting a meatshot from afar with random spread on was stupid, this fixes things like that.

Ched

.tony

Some people are whining about mid-range meatshots, this is probably impossible to do with the spread and happens with fixed spread turned off.

gryzor

Not having this set to “1” is like forcing crits enabled. Has that ever been considered a good idea?

No.

Less randomness = good for people who has over 10 hours game time, more randomness = awesome for a newcomer without a clue.

Hooray.

d2m

vertex »
derptex9

Not having this set to “1” is like forcing crits enabled. Has that ever been considered a good idea?

No.

Less randomness = good for people who has over 10 hours game time, more randomness = awesome for a newcomer without a clue.

Hooray.

I agree with Gryzor :]

Black_Bob

[DA]

1

sajh

[j]\\\'
[j]'

1
less randomnessessess for the people!

Sekhel

1

Wan’t to play a luck-based game, go play with dices.


Last edited by Sekhel,

Add A Reply Pages: « Previous 1 ... 7 8 9 10 Next »