x
ETF2L is looking for new Staff to recruit! Are you interested in supporting the league? Then click here for more details on what we can offer and how to apply! 

Forum

Promotion / Relegation & divisions?

Created 25th November 2009 @ 09:20

Add A Reply Pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »

Tikcus

The biggest problem with smaller divisions is the number of teams that drop, making some divisions almost pointless.

etf2l S6 % of teams dropped per division (after initial drops were replaced)

Div 1 – 20% (2 out of 10)
Div 2 – 20% (4 out of 20)
Div 3 – 12.5% (5 out of 40)
Div 4 – 21.67% (13 out of 60)
Div 5 – 16% (16 out of 100)
Div 6 – 14% (14 out of 100)

if divisions were smaller, some divisions would last 2/3 weeks.

back to the promotions/relegations if you finish bottom you should get relegated, a team who finishes top of the division below, shouldn’t be denied promotion on the basis of 2 lost maps, after 10 weeks of hard work, by finishing bottom, you have proved you were not good enough for the higher division, win the lower division next season and come back stronger

vlad_drac

xoxo

All this bullshit, and basically common sense is exactly what’s needed.

Are all of the div2 teams that could get promoted capable of what promotion will bring? Possibly not. Are there teams out there who can handle what promotion will bring? Possibly.

You’ve got to start from the start, and get your divisions sorted out properly and accurately in the first place. From there, at the end of the season you’d hardly have to work anything out for yourselves.

Let’s take an example of what effect it can have when you misplace a team.

This season we’ve only had one reasonably challenging game, and that’s no disrespect to the other teams, the games were always fun, but largely one sided. Now, with or without our banned demoman, we were still around a div2 level, so i’m going to pretend that there’s a random team called “bob” who are in a similar situation to us.

There’s 4 div2 teams that dropped and at least a couple who probably weren’t capable of div2. So the teams who are at the top of div2 are basically given an easier ride to the top of div2.

So they’re top of div2 now and that means promotion into div1. Does that mean they’re the best of the div2 clans that are around and thus moving into the div1 circle is justified? Not necessarily – there are div2 clans in div3. But next season they’ll be in div1 when they should be in div2, and some demoted div1 teams that should be in div1 are now in div2, so AGAIN the div2 table is less accurate than it should be and the div1 teams will probably just go straight back up again. Also don’t forget the div3 table was unbalanced because of a div2 team being put there. So decent teams that COULD contend in div2 won’t be able to now because a promotion spot was taken by the div2 clan.

And let’s say that during the whole season, “bob” team were progressively capable of handling top teams. Well they were in div3 and promoted, so now they’re in div2, and the very difficult games they’ll play will be against, you guessed it, div1 clans in div2, further upsetting the balance of the div2 table.

The problem is having such an extremely rigid promotion/demotion/don’t change anything/don’t make the leagues any bigger system. We’re playing a computer game, and shit changes every single day.

That’s my verdict anyway. You can’t have such strict and unbending rules for such a flexible and ever changing community. Liberally using your common sense to place teams may be unpopular with a few teams who feel like they deserve better, but i think that can be minimised. And at the end of the day, placing teams properly will encourage growth in the game.

Er.. essay again. Sorry

TL:DR – League placements/promo/demotions are too rigid, ends up placing teams in the wrong place which has major knock on effects which make things even more wrong. Place them correctly, use common sense, better for community, less harmfull overall.


Last edited by vlad_drac,

GangsterAlgot

Actually, there is a great solution to all this. If the top teams actually used the ladder we would have acurate information about which team’s better than the other. So now when the league is nearing the end I wish that the top teams could get active in the ladder and show that Team Vertex isn’t the best team around (no offence to Team Vertex).

On a related topic: If we use the ladder this way, we can’t have seperate teams for the league and ladder.

Depch

I don’t think it should be any harder than it already is to get promoted. Some of the current div1 teams don’t even play PCWS and they have barely won a map in the league. I don’t think keeping those stale and un-competitive teams in the top flite is going to be an advantage to anyone.

Yes this opinion is biased but yes it does have a good point before you rage.

I’m also confused from Seraph’s post.

My viewpoint is rather this, I’d rather prove my worth to play in the upper division by beating the worst team from there than just get in and get assraped like what has happened LOL Team (sorry guys!=)) If you lose a series, well you clearly don’t belong there, if you do, well it’s well deserved and proven.

And what you are talking is realistically about the situation how it is now, IF we did get a premiere division the current div1 would have 6 extra spots to add on for next season so it already would balance out the competition levels to pretty much how the teams actually are.

IF we don’t get the new system, which seems quite likely the divisions would balance themselves out in time as they’d have to prove their worth in playoff series, maybe not directly yet in the next season but eventually the better teams would stay in div1.

Randdalf

(0v0)

Maybe you could have a short pre-season, ala the american leagues, with a pool of “candidates” to be put in divisions (i.e. those who got promoted/relegated), using a Swiss Tournament system http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_tournament

WARHURYEAH

GlueEater

what vlad said

I agree with this, in some divisions there seems to be a big misplacement with the teams where one team is rolling all the others.

However this is always going to happen, one team will always have a better team than the rest, which is why they are top, so it is upto the others to improve their game and become better.

Hopefully things will balance itself out and people will be put into the correct divisions eventually, the tougher teams in the divisions will simply have to go up the long way to get where they belong.

Koeitje

AUTOBOTS

Actually, there is a great solution to all this. If the top teams actually used the ladder we would have acurate information about which team’s better than the other. So now when the league is nearing the end I wish that the top teams could get active in the ladder and show that Team Vertex isn’t the best team around (no offence to Team Vertex).

On a related topic: If we use the ladder this way, we can’t have seperate teams for the league and ladder.

You wouldn’t. What would steamrolling div3/4/5/6 clans show?

We in TDR are quite lucky with our div, most opponents still offer a good challenge. Wasn’t expecting the russians and spaniards doing so well, combined with the default loss we have we can’t afford any mistakes.


Last edited by Koeitje,

GangsterAlgot

You wouldn’t. What would steamrolling div3/4/5/6 clans show?

We in TDR are quite lucky with our div, most opponents still offer a good challenge. Wasn’t expecting the russians and spaniards doing so well, combined with the default loss we have we can’t afford any mistakes.

If other top teams (div1-2) were active in the ladder you wouldn’t play matches where you steamroll lower divs, you would play against teams at (hopefully) your skill level. The problem right now is that the higher div teams aren’t active enough to make this happen.

A way to fix this would be to input the results from the league matches to the ladder, maybe with some manipulation of the k value. But maybe I should stop posting this here and start posing it in the Ladder thread

A way to fix this would be to input the results from the league matches to the ladder, maybe with some manipulation of the k value. But maybe I should stop posting this here and start posing it in the Ladder thread

That’s been suggested a couple of times, but apparently the admins don’t like the idea. No idea why :-(

On a related topic: If we use the ladder this way, we can’t have seperate teams for the league and ladder.

I think most people just want 6v6 teams and ladders teams, both of which can play the ladder if they like. I don’t really see why someone shouldn’t be able to play ladder matches in different teams, maybe just limit the ladder team roster sizes to something reasonable.


Last edited by Sturmis,

hups


Last edited by Sturmis,

Skyride

DUCS

vlad for head admin please

GangsterAlgot

vlad for head admin please

seconded.

Jones

“Are all of the div2 teams that could get promoted capable of what promotion will bring? Possibly not. Are there teams out there who can handle what promotion will bring? Possibly.”

There are about 3-4 teams in div2 for certain that could handle div1 in it’s current state and on their current form. The same point applies between division 3 & 2 etc etc etc.

I’ll use real teams for this point (sorry). If LOL team and eSrael got demoted to division 2, neither of them could win promotion back to division 1 (IN MY OPINION!!!) unless they had serious improvements in their rosters and form.

I think the league runs on too tight a schedule. If they added two extra weeks to the end of the season calendar, it could be possible to replace folded teams as late as week 3/4. With careful planning this could potentially be achieved and make the season finale more entertaining.

Then again, you could make the super league with 6 teams like others have suggested.

Add: If vlad is running for head admin, please can he learn to get to the point. His wall of text clan give me eye hurt ;(


Last edited by Jones,

Depch

Adding new teams to the mix makes things more complex. Yea all in all using common sense would work out maybe the best, but there will be frowning about it and every respectable league has a system & rules they go along with.

New teams bring a variety of problems. It’s very easy to fold a team and just make a new team with established players and get back to the same compeitition level, this should change or there should be some common sense rule about it, keeping a struggling team survive for a bad season should be rewarding, not just easy to dump it and start a new. Also placing new teams top divisions are problematic to keep the level of play. At the moment you simply just can’t put a new team ahead of a clan that has deserved their promotion by playing a season or a few under their belts with the current promotion/relegation system it just destroys the integrity. Maybe new teams could be placed to that playoff system to play out for the spot in the division that they prolly are gonna be OR just place new teams at best to top 3 div. This would encourage teams to keep their teams in div1/div2 unfolded and try to work them out as it would take at least 2 seasons to get back to div1.. so a the team can’t wait for 2 seasons to get back to div1? well screw then, sounds like it’s all about gloryhunting and if things don’t work out as planned they are likely to fold out again though this also has it’s problems in it too. Anyways something needs to be done, etf2l started as a community project and if deciding admins (some) don’t give a shit or do a thing let community make the effort yet again. =)

Jones

You make a good point and I do respect you advocating loyalty. I don’t think loyalty is something you can force/push though.

Add A Reply Pages: « Previous 1 2 3 Next »