Forum
Reaction times
Created 23rd April 2014 @ 14:20
Add A Reply Pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 ... 7 Next »
Average time: – 126 ms http://prntscr.com/3cp3vi
Main class: – Scout/Sniper
ETF2L division: – Div4 HL
Quoted from winterz
[…]
or bullshit or the fastest man alive
Some people are just so desperate to get attention, look cool and what not. You know “penis enlargement”, sad really, though shouldn’t judge, let everyone spent their time as best as they see fit.
Average time: 266ms
Main class: Medic
ETF2L division: 3 highlander
slightly disappointing to be honest…
254
Medic/Engineer
Div 2 HL
Welp
Average time: – 196 http://puu.sh/8knTv.png
Main class: – Spy
ETF2L division: – Prem/1
age is relevant for sure but as someone said, i think hardware factors in a lot.
i averaged 257ms. looking at the results here most people are somewhere between 200 and 260.
looking at an article on response time to various stimuli i they found an average of 500 ms in response to a single visual stimulus like this (coupled to tactile feedback)
“The average response time for visual stimuli across all
choice tasks and response fingers was 0.517ms with standard
deviation of 0.181ms”
time spent behind a computer was found to have a significant effect, and the fact that we all play videogames (and are decent at them) will probably have an even larger effect.
“With regard to the age, in general, the response time
decreased with increase of age up to 21-30 years, and
thereafter the response time increased with increase of age”
source: Ng, A & Chan, A (2012) Finger Response Times to Visual, Auditory and Tactile Modality Stimuli; Proceedings of the International MultiConference of engineers and Computer Scientists.
tl;dr: anyone who says <200 ms is a liar.
Quoted from quell
age is relevant for sure but as someone said, i think hardware factors in a lot.
i averaged 257ms. looking at the results here most people are somewhere between 200 and 260.
looking at an article on response time to various stimuli i they found an average of 500 ms in response to a single visual stimulus like this (coupled to tactile feedback)
“The average response time for visual stimuli across all
choice tasks and response fingers was 0.517ms with standard
deviation of 0.181ms”time spent behind a computer was found to have a significant effect, and the fact that we all play videogames (and are decent at them) will probably have an even larger effect.
“With regard to the age, in general, the response time
decreased with increase of age up to 21-30 years, and
thereafter the response time increased with increase of age”source: Ng, A & Chan, A (2012) Finger Response Times to Visual, Auditory and Tactile Modality Stimuli; Proceedings of the International MultiConference of engineers and Computer Scientists.
tl;dr: anyone who says <200 ms is a liar.
Tried like 8 (x5) times and I got anything from 150-250 mostly, and on my last try got what I posted before. May have gotten lucky as fuck as I can’t replicate it :D
Quoted from quell
tl;dr: anyone who says <200 ms is a liar.
like
u wot m8
i tried at 60 hz monitor and best i got was 240.Im pretty sure 120hz improves it
213
scout
none
Quoted from Limp.
[…]
Some people are just so desperate to get attention, look cool and what not.
Last edited by Cauthon,
Quoted from quell
The fact that we all play videogames (and are decent at them) w
Decent is a nasty word for a gathering of the best TF2 players in Europe.
Add A Reply Pages: « Previous 1 2 3 4 ... 7 Next »