ping test/routing

Nacho

TTS

11 years ago

i have around 70ms, and i’m from Portugal using fiber

atmo

11 years ago

Quoted from aura

[…]
[…]
why would anyone use that as an avatar

you jealous?

aura

11 years ago

Quoted from atmo

[…]
you jealous?

that lens on that 4/3″ sensor suuuuuure

Reservoir Dog

TC.Express

11 years ago

Off topic guys.

CHERRY

11 years ago

My home (Poland):
Pinging 212.224.92.93 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=56 Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 212.224.92.93: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 110ms, Average = 98ms

My server #1 (Poland):
root@fazz3:~# ping 212.224.92.93 PING 212.224.92.93 (212.224.92.93) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=1 ttl=53 time=29.1 ms 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=2 ttl=53 time=24.9 ms 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=3 ttl=53 time=30.7 ms 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=4 ttl=53 time=27.4 ms --- 212.224.92.93 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.987/28.080/30.771/2.146 ms

My server #2 (France):
root@thor:~# ping 212.224.92.93 PING 212.224.92.93 (212.224.92.93) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=1 ttl=59 time=9.24 ms 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=2 ttl=59 time=8.90 ms 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=3 ttl=59 time=9.31 ms 64 bytes from 212.224.92.93: icmp_req=4 ttl=59 time=9.51 ms --- 212.224.92.93 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.905/9.243/9.516/0.230 ms

hiperz-evcz

11 years ago

//edit, ok sorry.

realized only now you were ping FROM servers.

OK thanks :)

Is the ping being good to the server itself rom your home?

Last edited by hiperz-evcz, 11 years ago

CHERRY

11 years ago

It’s bad, but it’s nothing new with my ISP.

https://gist.github.com/Kuba77/7107114

hiperz-evcz

11 years ago

Quoted from CHERRY

It’s bad, but it’s nothing new with my ISP.

https://gist.github.com/Kuba77/7107114

Thanks for the test :)

LaMqTa

fenneks

11 years ago

Pinging 212.224.92.93 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.224.92.93: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.224.92.93:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 59ms

from Bulgaria

Last edited by LaMqTa, 11 years ago

Alex_jj