Season 7 powered by SteelSeries

Division 6k

Week 3

Date Scheduled:
Results submitted:
by nalim (Risentalent)

cp_granary

cp_granary

5 - 5

[Screenshots: A B C D ]

cp_gullywash

cp_gullywash

2 - 1

[Screenshots: A B ]

CzechRepublic Risentalent vs European Team Effects
4 - 1

SteamID Screenshots: A B C D

Players

Team Effects (5) Mort, Dego, apparat, frixx, wndrrrrrrrrrr
Risentalent (6) Monog, Poly, impulse, palker, PWboris, dareckov
Unrostered (3) tr1cky, profane, Dummy
Unregistered (1) rep.nalim(ek)

Warnings

  • Risentalent [Minor] Special kind of rule break (1st time) - see match comment for explanation

37 Comments

  1. Knolly said:

    27.2.2010 at 18.00 that is next saturday ok?

  2. Frix: LG said:

    suits me:)

  3. Default Date said:

    Because this match has not been scheduled by either of the teams, a default date has been set for this match.
    The default date is: Sunday, 07 March 2010, 20:00 CET
    Please play this match on the appointed time and submit the results.

  4. Frix: LG said:

    good!

  5. Wildcard said:

    A wildcard has been taken for this match by Team Effects.
    You must reschedule and play this game before 18/03/2010.

  6. Knolly said:

    Sorry the wildcard was drawn by mistake can the admin revert it plz??

  7. SnowiE: -9w- - -9m- said:

    Please note the date has been reverted to 07/03/2010 at 20:00cet, as it was before the wildcard was taken by mistake.

  8. iMpulse said:

    I’ve played second map (gullywash) instead of Monog, because he had internet connection problems.

  9. Kop: [CiC] - CiC said:

    can someone please explain all the mercs and why the screenies and the score dont match on granary ?

  10. Frix: LG said:

    the score on granary was 4-5 for us as they won one round unfairily when we tried to pause the game as one of our teammate had serious connection problems. I suggest we play granary again. gg on gullywash though

  11. Mortal: #YOLO - swimp said:

    Have to agree, the 6th round on granary was won unfairly, since they didn’t even have the ETF2L config enabled. We couldn’t pause the game since one of our players had technical issues.

    I believe that we should play the map again, since it would be fair to both parts.

  12. nalim: nnY. - CS said:

    Half of their team rage-quited after the first map but the other half have found mercs to replace them. I don’t know why they didn’t write it here. Granary was a problem, because after end of the round (it was 3-2, rep won it so 3-3). They wanted to pause the game, because one of the players has timed-out. The config was bugged so they coudn’t pause. We had to exec the config again with timelimit 12 and it ended 2-2 – the final score was 5-5

    They had a really bad behaviour, were extremly vulgar and we were waiting for the gullywash begin 25min

  13. Mortal: #YOLO - swimp said:

    The player timed out during the 6th round and were therefore not played fair, we wanted to pause the game but couldn’t until you fixed your config and we could pause after you won the 6th round.
    Please do define how the fx. members acted vulgar to your team. I only recon one of our merc raging out a bit because the config didn’t work and we lost the round because of that which I find that he is in his right to when the servers settings isn’t optimal.

    But we could discuss this back and forth forever and never end this “conflict” I still think we should play granary again.

  14. Frix: LG said:

    Excatly and please nalim dont say we had bad behaviour and blame everything on us.

  15. iMpulse said:

    You probably couldn’t pause the game but we have won the 6th round fairly, because the Rule 1.6.14 says:
    If 1 player of a team drops from the server, the game may be paused at the end of the current round (or when both team’s intelligence is in their base on CTF maps) to allow the player to return. That means that you can pause the game only at the end of the round, so our win at 6th round was fair.

  16. iMpulse said:

    And if you want to define how some of your players were vulgar, I have screenshots.

  17. Junde: NMH - sisu said:

    Hmm isnt that against the rules that u play a match with wrong configs? huh?

  18. iMpulse said:

    I agree that that was our fault, it wasn’t our server, we had to find some really quick. The config wasn’t wrong, it just wasn’t latest updated.

  19. PWboris: RT. said:

    hey what’s that unregistered: rep.boris, we apologize for the config but the granary was played correctly your player timed out during 6th round so we had to finish it

  20. D2M: vertex » - derptex9 said:

    Please upload both STV demos for this match.

  21. Mortal: #YOLO - swimp said:

    That would be Represents-Gaming that have to upload those, since they hosted the server.

  22. Frix: LG said:

    Indeed

  23. stwn said:

    I agree, i was a bit offensive – however, with due reason, represents-gaming members didnt have all the things mentioned above, and in steam friends chat one of ’em was a douche. It was not an old config or anything – it was just a couple of the most important (crits, rounds limit, time limit, weaponspread) enabled.

  24. Knolly said:

    ^+1

  25. nalim: nnY. - CS said:

    We dont have demo of STV,because STV didnt record the match

  26. Poly: CS said:

    But I can upload my demo ;)

  27. Junde: NMH - sisu said:

    but didn’t u see that admin asked for STV demos which u haven’t got? :o

  28. Poly: CS said:

    I think that is not in rules.. or i didn’t found it.. Than we did not record it.

  29. Mortal: #YOLO - swimp said:

    1.6.3 Every player has to record Demos

    Every player is supposed to record Demos of every map and keep them for at least 2 weeks. A player and his team who can’t manage to bespeak a requested demo will be punished.

    It’s true that this does not mention the STV, it’s just that it makes things a lot easier and every player don’t have to upload their demos.

    This is the only place the STV is mentioned

    1.6.10 Only authorized spectators allowed

    No spectators are allowed unless they are authorized by the league or for the use of a Source TV.

  30. Poly: CS said:

    And where is the rule: You must record STV demo.. It only say that every player must record the match and the second is about spectators and stv.. not about recording stv

  31. Mortal: #YOLO - swimp said:

    I’m going to quote myself
    “It’s true that this does not mention the STV”

    I agree with you, don’t go in defense here. I support your statement :)

  32. Junde: NMH - sisu said:

    when does this match results come :o like who won..?

  33. SnowiE: -9w- - -9m- said:

    If you do not have stv demos, please upload some first person demos so we can see what has happened in this match.

  34. Mortal: #YOLO - swimp said:

    I just uploaded mine :)

  35. iMpulse said:

    I’ve uploaded Poly’s demo.

  36. SnowiE: -9w- - -9m- said:

    We are currently reviewing the demos and will resolve this situation soon.

  37. SnowiE: -9w- - -9m- said:

    After reviewing the demo I have decided the following –

    The result for cp_granary stands at 5-5
    This is because a pause was not requested in the round that Team Effects lost a player, you contested middle and did not make any mention that you needed to pause until after the round ended. If you ever find yourselves in this situation again, make sure that you tell your opponent that you need to pause BEFORE you try and pause the game, and as a gesture of good faith, do not contest the current capture point. If you try and pause the game and it doesn’t work, tell your opponents this straight away in a calm way.

    Represents-Gaming recieve a minor warning for an incorrectly set up server
    If you provide a server for a game, it is your responsibility to check that it is set up correctly. This includes making sure the correct config is installed and has not been altered in any way.

    Both teams will not receive a warning for their behaviour THIS TIME, AND THIS TIME ONLY
    The abusive messages were unacceptable, if either team insults their opponents again I will have no hesitation in giving you a full warning for it. You narrowly escaped receiving a warning this time, do not ever behave like this again!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.