Season 3: Week 2 (Division 4a)
Scheduled: September 7, 2008 | Results Submitted: September 7, 2008
eXhale vs
Necrotic United Brothers 
1 - 4
SteamIDs: A
Warnings:
- eXhale: [Minor] played with 4 players when rules says minimal of 5 players
Demos
- No demos for this match
15 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
September 7th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
gl hf
September 7th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
gl hf :)
September 7th, 2008 at 7:31 pm
thanks!!!!!!!!!
September 7th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
4on6. gg mates
September 7th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
Considering we played most of Gravel and half of Badlands with 5 people I think we did pretty good. Even managed to cap C on Gravel with only 4 people :) … If it had been 6 vs 6 we’d probably have won quite easy.
September 7th, 2008 at 9:56 pm
Well we played 4 vs 6 on gravelpit and still 3-3 and 5 vs 6 3-2 on badlands, fair and square…fuck my as. All we asked for was for you to paus for 3 fucking minutes in gravelpit so we could get one more player in the match but no you couldn’t even do that, I really can’t say gg on this one becouse you didn’t earn it.
September 8th, 2008 at 3:19 am
1.6.7 Minimum of 5 players needed to play a match
Your team will need at least 5 players to play a scheduled 6on6 match. You can ask your opponent to allow you a ringer (maximum: 2) to field in your team. Your opponent doesn’t have to agree to a ringer.
September 8th, 2008 at 8:11 am
Well we know the rules, I don’t talk about ringers here either. So what do you do if something happends just before the match?
Maybe you should look over the rules for wildcard etc, You don’t stand a chanse if something should happend just before a match. Like it did to us. This wasent planned.
Shit happens!
September 8th, 2008 at 8:13 am
And we did start with five people though i dropped sometimes (connection problems) So then again should we really get a minor warning if we did start the match with five people and four people in the end?
September 8th, 2008 at 8:26 am
As Pedro said, we started with five people. One having trouble with internet and getting disconnected all the time hence we had 4 players alot of the time at gravel.
September 8th, 2008 at 8:27 am
Lets just leave this alone, Dont’t feel like have a big discussion about this matter.
September 8th, 2008 at 9:08 am
No need to get agitated. NUB could have been kind enough to pause while eXhale was down to 4 men. Its called fair play. On the other hand, they are not to blame for one players connection problems, and if it happened repeatedly, they cannot be expected to pause the game over and over.
As for them not allowing a ringer, it is their full right, and must be respected.
I do wonder however what the admins feel about the pausing of games. When does fair play turn into unfair play, and why did eXhale get a warning. Will we get warned too if two players have connection problems during the game?
September 8th, 2008 at 9:46 am
h.ulv: I can’t agree with you more, I would never blame NuB for our connection problems though that we get one warning for connection problems Is a shame.
September 8th, 2008 at 10:27 am
But if something like this happends again we will do a WO becouse you earn more when you do that.
September 8th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
if u dont have 4 players, oponent gets default win
and first of all, instead of comming here with show off saying u win 4vs6, watch the rules
lack of sportmainship from both teams, nub for not pausing, and exhale for show off after the game
i would thank the end of discussion about this game