Season 8 Powered by SteelSeries

Division 5a

Week 4

Date Scheduled:
Results submitted:
by Andee (GoT.love)

cp_obscure

cp_obscure

1 - 6

[Screenshots: A ]

cp_gravelpit

cp_gravelpit

2 - 0

[Screenshots: A ]

European GoT.love vs European Team Colonslash
3 - 3

Active Wildcards:

SteamID Screenshots: A B C

Players

Team Colonslash (5) TviQ, Energyyy, Spookypants, Aji, Spike Himself
GoT.love (6) LUH-3417, Shabbaman, Andee, markyB, Asskicker, TonyGappa
Unrostered (1) KrullkrigareN^

38 Comments

  1. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Goeiedaag!

    We can play Su/Mo/Tu/We/Th from ~20.30. Add me on steam ^^

  2. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    You forgot the challenge tickbox ;)

  3. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Nope. I intentionally didn’t tick the checkbox as there’s plenty of time left.

  4. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    :)

  5. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Any chance we could perhaps reschedule this? As it stands we’re going to have to use a merc on this date. If rescheduling is not an option, that’s fine, but it would be great if we could :)

  6. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Sure, no problem? Are we talking about the same week or what? Talk to me on Steam tonight. BTW, I think you can still add new proposals on the “my matches” page.

  7. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Yeah, probably the same week. Not quite sure when exactly yet though.
    We’re also in the middle of trialing people at the moment, so chances are we can play this date without mercs after all, I’m just not entirely sure right now.
    But yeah, I will talk to you on steam later today.

    Cheers :)

  8. DeNeusbeer: (Legend) - HoT<3 said:

    This should be interesting.

  9. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    For who?

  10. DeNeusbeer: (Legend) - HoT<3 said:

    For me.

    Also to Colonslash: Feel the Love!

  11. Wildcard said:

    A wildcard has been taken for this match by GoT.love.
    You must reschedule and play this game before 29/11/2010.

  12. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Hi guys, unfortunately I am sick (and this time not only in my head). Could we try again next monday?

  13. Spike Himself: TC said:

    No problemo :)

  14. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Can we use this merc?
    http://etf2l.org/forum/user/17933/

  15. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Meh. I would deny it if I could. You really thought I’d be happy if you merc a guy who thinks he should be playing in div. 3? But as he’s now without team you could’ve simply added him to your roster (for just the night) and there’d have been nothing I could’ve done. So I can’t see a valid reason to say no, but obviously I’d rather have you play with some div. 5/6 schmuck. Despite your aspirations, we’re still both playing in div. 5 you know. Bottom line: go ahead, but don’t ask me to nominate you for the sportsmanship award at the end of the season.

    Now that we’re talking anyway, I’d ask you something as well. Neusbeer asked me to test PMOD for the ETF2L. It’s plugin that generates this kind of data after the match: http://pmod.etboosts.com/_test/samplerepo.php?idx=106

    Pretty cool right? We would’ve tested it last night, but someone insisted to play without sourcemod enabled (and denying us to play on our own server in the process, as we can’t even change maps without sourcemod). I don’t know if you are as paranoid as he is, so I’m asking in advance.

  16. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Oh, the only thing is that we’d have to play on our server or on an official ETF2L server.

  17. Spike Himself: TC said:

    I have no problems with you denying a merc, but are you saying we should get a merc that plays below our own level just because “this is only div5”? o.O Fantomen is actually trialing for us, so he might as well be in our roster..

    ** Nothing here has anything to do with sportsmanship **
    We are not ‘cheating’ on you by having a higher div merc. We are requesting a merc that plays at our own level!

    Alternatively, we have more trialists that we could ask to merc for us, but the same will go for them. They all come from div4/3 (having played different classes in most cases).

    I’m not trying to be difficult here, mind. I’m as against carry mercs as you are, but we’re not requesting to use a carry merc here. Again, we are requesting a merc that plays at our own level.

    Also, we have always had a demoman skilled slightly above ourselves. If we had not been in the situation we are in (losing our demoman and having to find mercs and trialists), it would not be any different for you guys. Please bear in mind that our merc is replacing our main caller.

    Just saying.

    Anyway, I will try to look for another merc, but I can’t make any promises.

    ps. we are fine with the PMOD testing and will play on your (NL?) server.

  18. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Hey, I’m not denying you that merc. I’m only pointing out that I’m not happy with it, and explaining why. Like I said, we’re both playing in div. 5 ;)

    Please go ahead and trial him, if you reread what I said I wasn’t asking you to look for someone else! I really don’t see why I should object to it, but that still doesn’t mean I have to be happy with getting his pipes in my face all night. And I actually started with stating that he could’ve been on your roster to begin with.

  19. Spike Himself: TC said:

    I understand you weren’t denying us the merc. I am merely appreciating the fact that you’re not happy with it (while explaining we’re not trying to use a “carry merc” that plays WAY above our own level), hence I will try to find someone else – I just can’t make any promises in that regard.

    I am willing to do this because sportsmanship is important to us, and I take slight offense to your accusations. Sportsmanship is indeed entirely irrelevant when we want to use a merc who is probably joining our team anyway.

    We’re playing in this league to get good games. Winning is nice, but we’re not going to get carry mercs just so we can win more easily.

    That’s pretty much all I have been trying to say in my previous comment; we’re not trying to cheat on you, but we appreciate your concerns.

    I could just as easily say “we’re top div 5 and you’re not, so just deal with it”, but I don’t want to travel the elitist road.

  20. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Hm, I didn’t intend to insult you. Besides a different POV on what is “our own level” I have the idea you get my point (although it’s clear you don’t agree with me, which is fine). Your response is more than satisfactory. Besides that, I just saw Fantomen already played an official match with you, which is comforting enough for me that there is an actual possibility he will join your team. I’ve had bad experiences with mercs that turned out to carry some crappy teams to victory, but there’s no reason to take that out on you as you haven’t given the slightest reason for that (rather the opposite). By now it feels like nitpicking over something irrelevant, and I don’t want to take this negative energy into our match. Like I said, besides a bad feeling there’s no reason to object, and your response comforts me enough to take back my words, and please play with this guy. I’ll welcome his pipes in my face with grace.

  21. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Yes, I do indeed get your point. I am in fact willing to go for a re-match if you feel our use of merc turns out inappropriate and unfair. By which I mean to imply that I am confident this won’t be the case.

    Thanks for understanding :)

  22. caneD: MEAT - LEGO said:

    lol

  23. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Thanks for your valuable input, caneD :)

  24. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Yeah, in the end it probably wouldn’t matter much who you’d field anyway. But the upside is that we’ll have those pretty awesome pmod stats to see what actually happened. Let’s focus on that instead.

  25. LUH-3417: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    This is better than Shakespeare.

  26. Fantomen: nandos said:

    My pipe aim is fucking shit

  27. LUH-3417: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    What I wanted to say is that I thoroughly enjoyed the discussion here above, because it utterly defeats the notion that people who partake in events designed to test their prowess in the electronical sports are of a rude and pitiable kind.

    The gentlemen above have shown beyond any shadow of a doubt that they are truly that; gentle men of good breeding and better upbringing, both being wise and kind in their ways and fully able to take part in a serious exchange of views and ideas whilst never lower themselves to the detestable level which, alas, is so common in our modern albeit rude world.

    Please be so kind as to consider my hats tipped.

  28. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Aye, we are the gentle manne of good leisure. And spam.

  29. skeej: (ETF2L Donator) - UbeR | - Fe | said:

    Ik kom hier gewoon ff mensen geluk wensen en dan moet ik door heel dit boekwerk heen spitten? NOU DAN NIET HOOR

  30. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    STV 217.23.9.184:20405

  31. Spike Himself: TC said:

    Oh hey skeej =D

    gg, very well played on gpit :)

  32. Energyyy said:

    Good game. It was pretty intense on Gravel Pit, but as you can see, we need a lot of practise ;).

    Cheers!

  33. TviQ: ft. - 007 said:

    gg

  34. Andee: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    gg TC, good luck in your coming matches :)

  35. Asskicker: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    Nice game, I still don’t believe we actually won Gravelpit! :P

  36. Spookypants said:

    GG;) GL to u too.

  37. Shabbaman: GoT<3 - HoT<3 said:

    @energy: nobody wants to practice gravelpit…

    Nice match, despite the neverending buttrape on Obscure. That Ninja was everywhere… are you sure you don’t want to trade him? Pity about the PMOD crash.

    GL in your remaining matches!

  38. Gonzo said:

    I love our match pages! GL in your future matches TC

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.