6v6 Ladder 2010: Challenge
Scheduled: Dec 1, 2009, 20:30 CET | Results Submitted: Dec 1, 2009, 23:29 CET
undecided2 vs
Clan Crazy
0 (-24) - (+24) 1
SteamIDs: A
Players
| undecided2 | (4) Dav1dd, Gubbins, Imperium, julieN1 |
| Clan Crazy | (6) Black_Bob, Tango, foosian, beach, elma, -HaviT- |
| Unregistered | (2) LUPUS, Morty |
Match report by Black_Bob
Well this was intresting we arranged this match ages ago and the maps were agreed.
First map we played was cft_2fort and we aloud them to use a merc no questions asked.
The match began and everything was fine until it was 2 - 0 to crazy and then it went downhill, vertex2 started to state they were not happy and the match should be rescheduled.
We agreed we would replay cp_yukon at a latter date.
Here is the stv for the match.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1772167/2fortdem.zip
15 Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







content rss
November 12th, 2009 at 20:15
hey guys, cheers for the challenge
how does thursday 19th sound , 21.30 CET?
November 12th, 2009 at 21:03
Hey, sorry, we already have a ladder match scheduled then, in fact the best day would be Monday the 23rd or Tuesday the 24th, sorry.
I’ll contact you on steam, as those maps are just any maps, we could pick a map each.
November 15th, 2009 at 21:00
Teams have agreed to play MONDAY 30TH NOVEMBER @ 21:30 CET.
November 15th, 2009 at 21:09
Maps : Cp_yukon + ctf_2fort
November 15th, 2009 at 21:09
cheers for putting that on davidd, was about to myself :)
November 17th, 2009 at 21:34
Hey, just to say that we can’t make this match unfortunately and have to cancel in advance because of multiple people leaving recently, i hope you understand, sorry :(
November 18th, 2009 at 00:12
this match MAY be rescheduled due to the problems in the vertex2 team, im sure we can agree on something davidd :)
November 19th, 2009 at 20:30
Match Reminder
This challenge was accepted more than 7 days ago. You must play this game before 26/11/2009 or both teams will automatically incur a 5 point penalty. Penalty points will be removed upon completion of this match. Please schedule and play this game as soon as possible
December 1st, 2009 at 22:37
We had 3 members on at the time, asked for a reschedule, they disagreed and told us that the reason they wanted 2fort was solely because they thought we wouldn’t have played it and they would get an easy win, that they knew we wouldn’t reject because we’d lose points…
December 1st, 2009 at 23:34
Well on the stv there will be the entire conversation if anyone really wants to read it.
And i thought we said we picked the map since we wanted to win, is somthing wrong with picking a map you have a chance on?
Were happy to play the map you picked cp_yukon anytime.
December 2nd, 2009 at 18:13
copy paste log from stv please, might as well be put on.
and in itself no, for something like the league it’s important to win but ladder is much more test maps, have pcws, enjoy yourself etc. if you play to win the ladder then fine, but going out of any map played in league or pcw to do so is ridiculous. and pathetic.
December 3rd, 2009 at 00:12
Heres the log for yukon and 2fort
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1772167/vertexyukon.zip
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1772167/vertex2.zip
December 3rd, 2009 at 10:23
I do find it insulting to be called unsporting when we said it was ok to start the map late and we didnt mind you fielding 2 mercs because of line up issues .
If you dont like the map pool complain to etfl not us we dont make the rules . As bob has said we are happy to play yukon anytime which you should win quite easily as you know we are just public players
Thanks for the game
December 5th, 2009 at 20:49
1) The first merc is in our clan, but rosters are locked
2) The second merc is at our skill level.
If you disallowed either of those mercs, you would have been even more unsporting, so dont claim that was sporting of you. It should be expected
3) “complain to etf2l about the map pool” – do you really think that? Sure, it shouldnt be there. But if you acknowledge it shouldnt be there and use it because “we havent practiced it”, then your logic is terrible. You want to win a ladder match and to do so you pick an unenjoyable map which noone plays. Why? cos its shit, fact. You can say we agreed all you like, but it was one of us who agreed. Thats not your fault, but its still ridiculous as is your morals
December 5th, 2009 at 20:50
oh and lol. Nice taking a screen when theres more of us than you, and that you were capping whilst people had already left. pathetic. if we left at 2-0, report 2-0 rather than being petty